Quadro NVS 290 vs Quadro FX 560

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1198
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.95
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG73G86
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date20 April 2006 (18 years ago)4 October 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 $149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed350 MHz459 MHz
Number of transistors177 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt21 Watt
Texture fill rate4.2003.672
Floating-point processing powerno data0.02938 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length198 mm168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount128 MB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DMS-59

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 560 113
NVS 290 228
+102%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 April 2006 4 October 2007
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 21 Watt

NVS 290 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 12.5% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 560 and Quadro NVS 290. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 560
Quadro FX 560
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
Quadro NVS 290

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 5 votes

Rate Quadro FX 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 21 vote

Rate Quadro NVS 290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.