Radeon Pro 5500 XT vs Quadro FX 550M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated248
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.53
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameG73Navi 14
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date13 March 2006 (18 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1536
Core clock speed480 MHz1187 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1757 MHz
Number of transistors177 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate5.760168.7
Floating-point processing powerno data5.398 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1296

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s224.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2006 4 August 2020
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 125 Watt

FX 550M has 257.1% lower power consumption.

Pro 5500 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 550M and Radeon Pro 5500 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 550M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon Pro 5500 XT is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 550M
Quadro FX 550M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Radeon Pro 5500 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 67 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.