ATI 3D Rage vs Quadro FX 550

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1412not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.37no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Mach (1992−1997)
GPU code nameNV43Mach64 GT
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date20 April 2006 (18 years ago)1 April 1996 (28 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed360 MHz44 MHz
Number of transistors146 million5 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm500 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Wattno data
Texture fill rate2.8800.04
ROPs41
TMUs81

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCI
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3EDO
Maximum RAM amount128 MB2 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz57 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s456.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)5.0
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)N/A
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 April 2006 1 April 1996
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 2 MB
Chip lithography 110 nm 500 nm

FX 550 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 354.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 550 and 3D Rage. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 550 is a workstation graphics card while 3D Rage is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 550
Quadro FX 550
ATI 3D Rage
3D Rage

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 6 votes

Rate Quadro FX 550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7 votes

Rate 3D Rage on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.