P106M vs Quadro FX 4700 X2

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking925not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.54no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameG92GP106
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date18 April 2008 (16 years ago)23 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1281152
Core clock speed600 MHz1291 MHz
Number of transistors754 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)226 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate38.4092.95
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS2.974 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs6472

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s96.13 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA1.16.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2008 23 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 226 Watt 75 Watt

P106M has an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 306.3% more advanced lithography process, and 201.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 4700 X2 and P106M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 4700 X2 is a workstation card while P106M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
Quadro FX 4700 X2
NVIDIA P106M
P106M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 4700 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate P106M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.