Iris Xe Graphics 96EU vs Quadro FX 380M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1320not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.85no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGT218Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16768
Core clock speed606 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors260 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate4.84872.00
Floating-point processing power0.04698 TFLOPS2.304 TFLOPS
ROPs424
TMUs848

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed790 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth12.64 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2010 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics 96EU has an age advantage of 12 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 380M and Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 380M is a mobile workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics 96EU is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M
Quadro FX 380M
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Quadro FX 380M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 187 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics 96EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.