Radeon Vega 7 vs Quadro FX 3800

Place in the ranking	858	526
Place by popularity	not in top-100	39
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.06	no data
Power efficiency	1.37	11.48
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GT200B	Cezanne
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	30 March 2009 (15 years ago)	13 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$799	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	448
Core clock speed	600 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1900 MHz
Number of transistors	1,400 million	9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	108 Watt	45 Watt
Texture fill rate	38.40	53.20
Floating-point processing power	0.4623 TFLOPS	1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	8
TMUs	64	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	IGP
Length	198 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	256 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	51.2 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.0	6.4
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	1.3	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	6−7 −283%	23 +283%
1440p	10−12 −260%	36 +260%
4K	5−6 −300%	20 +300%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	133.17	no data
1440p	79.90	no data
4K	159.80	no data

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.13	7.46
Recency	30 March 2009	13 April 2021
Chip lithography	55 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	108 Watt	45 Watt

Vega 7 has a 250.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 685.7% more advanced lithography process, and 140% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Vega 7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 3800 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3800 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Vega 7 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.