ATI Mobility Radeon X800XT vs Quadro FX 380

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1253not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency0.83no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)no data
GPU code nameG96M28Pro
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date30 March 2009 (15 years ago)8 June 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$129 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1622
Core clock speed450 MHz6 MHz
Boost clock speedno data480 MHz
Number of transistors314 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)34 Wattno data
Texture fill rate3.600no data
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3256
Maximum RAM amount256 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz550 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVIno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)no data
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2009 8 June 2005
Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm

FX 380 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 380 and Mobility Radeon X800XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 380 is a workstation card while Mobility Radeon X800XT is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 380
Quadro FX 380
ATI Mobility Radeon X800XT
Mobility Radeon X800XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 15 votes

Rate Quadro FX 380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobility Radeon X800XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.