ATI Radeon X800 CrossFire Edition vs Quadro FX 380 LP

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1309not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.80no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameGT218R423
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 December 2009 (14 years ago)28 October 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed550 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors260 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.4008.000
Floating-point processing power0.044 TFLOPSno data
ROPs416
TMUs816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s32 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort2x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2009 28 October 2005
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 130 nm

FX 380 LP has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 225% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 380 LP and Radeon X800 CrossFire Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 380 LP is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X800 CrossFire Edition is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
Quadro FX 380 LP
ATI Radeon X800 CrossFire Edition
Radeon X800 CrossFire Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 7 votes

Rate Quadro FX 380 LP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon X800 CrossFire Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.