GeForce RTX 2080 Super vs Quadro FX 3700M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 3700M with GeForce RTX 2080 Super, including specs and performance data.

FX 3700M
2008
1 GB GDDR3, 75 Watt
1.18

RTX 2080 Super outperforms FX 3700M by a whopping 4199% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking105654
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0132.49
Power efficiency1.1414.64
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG92TU104
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date14 August 2008 (16 years ago)23 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$925 $699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2080 Super has 324800% better value for money than FX 3700M.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1283072
Core clock speed550 MHz1650 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1815 MHz
Number of transistors754 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate35.20348.5
Floating-point processing power0.352 TFLOPS11.15 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs64192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-HEPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s495.9 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 3700M 1.18
RTX 2080 Super 50.73
+4199%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 3700M 456
RTX 2080 Super 19576
+4193%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−4567%
140
+4567%
1440p2−3
−4550%
93
+4550%
4K1−2
−7100%
72
+7100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3000%
90−95
+3000%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−1880%
99
+1880%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−3075%
127
+3075%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3000%
90−95
+3000%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−14000%
141
+14000%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−5567%
170
+5567%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−26500%
266
+26500%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1783%
113
+1783%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−2050%
301
+2050%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−6000%
122
+6000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2375%
198
+2375%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−609%
227
+609%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−2740%
142
+2740%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2900%
120
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3000%
90−95
+3000%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−11100%
112
+11100%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−4167%
128
+4167%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−25700%
258
+25700%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1833%
116
+1833%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1921%
283
+1921%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4900%
100
+4900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2713%
225
+2713%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−855%
100−110
+855%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−559%
211
+559%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−1260%
68
+1260%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2150%
90
+2150%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2867%
89
+2867%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7800%
79
+7800%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−13200%
133
+13200%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1700%
108
+1700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1057%
162
+1057%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2263%
189
+2263%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−891%
109
+891%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−134%
75
+134%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5800%
118
+5800%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−13300%
134
+13300%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−4550%
93
+4550%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−5700%
58
+5700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 65
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5600%
57
+5600%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−6900%
70
+6900%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1029%
79
+1029%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−3075%
127
+3075%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 80−85
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−4120%
211
+4120%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2575%
107
+2575%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 53

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−4000%
41
+4000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−3500%
36
+3500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 39
Far Cry 5 0−1 40

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2900%
60
+2900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 94
+0%
94
+0%
Battlefield 5 194
+0%
194
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 79
+0%
79
+0%
Battlefield 5 182
+0%
182
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70
+0%
70
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 57
+0%
57
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 249
+0%
249
+0%
Metro Exodus 90
+0%
90
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 141
+0%
141
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Hitman 3 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 131
+0%
131
+0%
Metro Exodus 89
+0%
89
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
+0%
79
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 31
+0%
31
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 81
+0%
81
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 82
+0%
82
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 34
+0%
34
+0%

This is how FX 3700M and RTX 2080 Super compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Super is 4567% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 Super is 4550% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2080 Super is 7100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2080 Super is 26500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Super is ahead in 47 tests (70%)
  • there's a draw in 20 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.18 50.73
Recency 14 August 2008 23 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 250 Watt

FX 3700M has 233.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 2080 Super, on the other hand, has a 4199.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 3700M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3700M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 2080 Super is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Quadro FX 3700M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
GeForce RTX 2080 Super

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2400 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.