GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile vs Quadro FX 3700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro FX 1700 Quadro FX 1800 Quadro FX 3000 Quadro FX 3000G Quadro FX 3400 Quadro FX 3450 Quadro FX 3500 Quadro FX 3700 Quadro FX 3800 Quadro FX 4600 Quadro FX 4800 Quadro FX 5800
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
RTX 2050 Max-Q RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 2060 Mobile RTX 2060 Max-Q RTX 2070 Mobile RTX 2070 Max-Q RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh RTX 2070 Super Max-Q RTX 2070 Super Mobile RTX 2080 Mobile RTX 2080 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 3700 with GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, including specs and performance data.

FX 3700
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 78 Watt
0.98

RTX 2070 Super Mobile outperforms FX 3700 by a whopping 3619% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

FX 3700 FX 3700
RTX 2070 Super Mobile RTX 2070 Super Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1106128
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.8721.95
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG92TU104B
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date8 January 2008 (16 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1122560
Core clock speed500 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1380 MHz
Number of transistors754 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)78 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate28.00220.8
Floating-point processing power0.28 TFLOPS7.066 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs56160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA1.17.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−3733%
115
+3733%
1440p2−3
−3750%
77
+3750%
4K1−2
−4400%
45
+4400%

Cost per frame, $

1080p533.00no data
1440p799.50no data
4K1599.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 104
+0%
104
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 83
+0%
83
+0%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 115
+0%
115
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 146
+0%
146
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 162
+0%
162
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Hitman 3 105
+0%
105
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 119
+0%
119
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 71
+0%
71
+0%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 101
+0%
101
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 119
+0%
119
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 112
+0%
112
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Hitman 3 104
+0%
104
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 97
+0%
97
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 63
+0%
63
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 61
+0%
61
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75
+0%
75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 83
+0%
83
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Hitman 3 92
+0%
92
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 121
+0%
121
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 87
+0%
87
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 61
+0%
61
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 108
+0%
108
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 75
+0%
75
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 56
+0%
56
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55
+0%
55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Hitman 3 61
+0%
61
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 89
+0%
89
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 84
+0%
84
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 41
+0%
41
+0%
Hitman 3 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Metro Exodus 67
+0%
67
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
+0%
59
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 36
+0%
36
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 32
+0%
32
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 31
+0%
31
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 25
+0%
25
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 43
+0%
43
+0%

This is how FX 3700 and RTX 2070 Super Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 3733% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 3750% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 4400% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.98 36.45
Recency 8 January 2008 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 78 Watt 115 Watt

FX 3700 has 47.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 2070 Super Mobile, on the other hand, has a 3619.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 3700 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3700 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
Quadro FX 3700
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FX 3700 Quadro FX 3700
vs
FX 1800 Quadro FX 1800
RTX 2070 Super Mobile GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
vs
RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
FX 3700 Quadro FX 3700
vs
NVS 315 NVS 315
Vega Frontier Edition Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
vs
Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000
9300M GS GeForce 9300M GS
vs
RTX A40 RTX A40
Iris Plus Graphics 640 Iris Plus Graphics 640
vs
Instinct MI8 Radeon Instinct MI8
Iris Plus Graphics 640 Iris Plus Graphics 640
vs
Instinct MI6 Radeon Instinct MI6
ATI 9000 Radeon 9000
vs
RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation
FireStream 9350 FireStream 9350
vs
Tesla T10 Processor Tesla T10 Processor
R7 360 896SP Radeon R7 360 896SP
vs
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
Quadro M2200 Quadro M2200
vs
Arc A550M Arc A550M
9400M (G) / ION (LE) GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
vs
UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 750
GRID K120Q GRID K120Q
vs
Parhelia 512

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 21 vote

Rate Quadro FX 3700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 393 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.