GeForce MX450 25W vs Quadro FX 360M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1370not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.89no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG86TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date9 May 2007 (17 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16896
Core clock speed400 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speedno data930 MHz
Number of transistors210 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20052.08
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS1.667 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs856

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA1.17.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 15 August 2020
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 25 Watt

FX 360M has 47.1% lower power consumption.

MX450 25W, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 360M and GeForce MX450 25W. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 360M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce MX450 25W is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
Quadro FX 360M
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W
GeForce MX450 25W

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 8 votes

Rate Quadro FX 360M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 26 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 25W on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.