Matrox G450 vs Quadro FX 3600M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1044not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.20no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)G400 (1999−2002)
GPU code nameG92Condor
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date23 February 2008 (16 years ago)1 January 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64no data
Core clock speed500 MHz125 MHz
Number of transistors754 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Wattno data
Texture fill rate16.000.25
Floating-point processing power0.16 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs322

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-HEPCI
Lengthno data150 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed799 MHz332 MBps
Memory bandwidth51.14 GB/s2.656 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)6.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3None
OpenCL1.1None
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 February 2008 1 January 2001
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 180 nm

FX 3600M has an age advantage of 7 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 176.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3600M and Matrox G450. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3600M is a mobile workstation card while Matrox G450 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
Quadro FX 3600M
Matrox G450
G450

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 8 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 8 votes

Rate Matrox G450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.