Radeon RX 6600 XT vs Quadro FX 350M

Place in the ranking	1440	90
Place by popularity	not in top-100	87
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	63.34
Power efficiency	0.51	18.65
Architecture	Curie (2003−2013)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	G72	Navi 23
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	13 March 2006 (18 years ago)	30 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	7	2048
Core clock speed	450 MHz	1968 MHz
Boost clock speed	450 MHz	2589 MHz
Number of transistors	112 million	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	160 Watt
Texture fill rate	1.800	331.4
Floating-point processing power	no data	10.6 TFLOPS
ROPs	2	64
TMUs	4	128
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	190 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	450 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c (9_3)	12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	3.0	6.5
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 350M 0.11

RX 6600 XT 42.80
+38809%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 350M 44

RX 6600 XT 16511
+37425%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	-0−1	135
1440p	-0−1	77
4K	-0−1	43

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.81
1440p	no data	4.92
4K	no data	8.81

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−3850%

79
+3850%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −2900%	90−95 +2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −4200%	85−90 +4200%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −3800%	78 +3800%
Hitman 3	4−5 −2600%	108 +2600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −2075%	170−180 +2075%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −3875%	150−160 +3875%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −375%	130−140 +375%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −2900%	90−95 +2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −4200%	85−90 +4200%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −3700%	76 +3700%
Hitman 3	4−5 −2600%	108 +2600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −2075%	170−180 +2075%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −5125%	209 +5125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −878%	85−90 +878%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −375%	130−140 +375%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −2900%	90−95 +2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −4200%	85−90 +4200%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −3350%	69 +3350%
Hitman 3	4−5 −2400%	100 +2400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1863%	157 +1863%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −4475%	183 +4475%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −1000%	99 +1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −118%	61 +118%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	40
Hitman 3	6−7 −1017%	67 +1017%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −5700%	116 +5700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−3600%

70−75
+3600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	28

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−1850%

35−40
+1850%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	129 +0%	129 +0%
Battlefield 5	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%
Metro Exodus	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	106 +0%	106 +0%
Battlefield 5	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%
Metro Exodus	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	75 +0%	75 +0%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

95−100

+0%

95−100

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	56 +0%	56 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	230−240 +0%	230−240 +0%
Metro Exodus	98 +0%	98 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	118 +0%	118 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Hitman 3	33 +0%	33 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	54 +0%	54 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	14 +0%	14 +0%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	61 +0%	61 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24 +0%	24 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6600 XT is 5700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 6600 XT is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.11	42.80
Recency	13 March 2006	30 July 2021
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	8 GB
Chip lithography	90 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	160 Watt

FX 350M has 966.7% lower power consumption.

RX 6600 XT, on the other hand, has a 38809.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 350M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 350M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6600 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.