Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 vs Quadro FX 350M
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | no data | PowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011) |
| GPU code name | G72M | Cedar Trail |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 31 March 2006 (18 years ago) | 1 November 2011 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 7 | 4 |
| Core clock speed | 3 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 450 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 112 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 1.800 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR-3 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | no data |
| Shader Model | 3.0 | no data |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | no data |
| OpenCL | N/A | no data |
| Vulkan | N/A | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 31 March 2006 | 1 November 2011 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 32 nm |
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 350M and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro FX 350M is a mobile workstation card while Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
