GeForce 8200M G mGPU vs Quadro FX 3500M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1140not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.11no data
Power efficiency1.22no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG71C77
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 March 2007 (17 years ago)3 June 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3216
Core clock speed575 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed575 MHzno data
Number of transistors278 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate13.801.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0256 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIIPCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed600 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2007 3 June 2008
Chip lithography 90 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 12 Watt

8200M G mGPU has an age advantage of 1 year, a 12.5% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3500M and GeForce 8200M G mGPU AMD. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3500M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce 8200M G mGPU AMD is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
Quadro FX 3500M
NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G mGPU AMD
GeForce 8200M G mGPU AMD

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 3500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 8200M G mGPU AMD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.