Radeon R7 240 OEM vs Quadro FX 3500

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1178not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.58no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameG71Oland
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 May 2006 (18 years ago)1 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data320
Core clock speed450 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speedno data780 MHz
Number of transistors278 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate9.00015.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4992 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs2020

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length173 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed660 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth42.24 GB/s28.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_1)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 May 2006 1 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 50 Watt

R7 240 OEM has an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3500 and Radeon R7 240 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3500 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 240 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500
Quadro FX 3500
AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM
Radeon R7 240 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 9 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 43 votes

Rate Radeon R7 240 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.