GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs Quadro FX 3500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro FX 1500 Quadro FX 3500 Quadro FX 4500 X2 Quadro FX 5500 Quadro FX 5500 SDI
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
RTX 4070 GDDR6 RTX 4070 SUPER RTX 4070 Ti RTX 4070 Ti SUPER RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 3500 with GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, including specs and performance data.

FX 3500
2006
256 MB GDDR3, 80 Watt
0.67

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms FX 3500 by a whopping 12224% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

FX 3500 FX 3500
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11827
Place by popularitynot in top-10089
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data48.88
Power efficiency0.5719.85
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG71AD103
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 May 2006 (18 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 $799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FX 3500 and RTX 4070 Ti SUPER have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data8448
Core clock speed450 MHz2340 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2610 MHz
Number of transistors278 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt285 Watt
Texture fill rate9.000689.0
Floating-point processing powerno data44.1 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs20264
Tensor Coresno data264
Ray Tracing Coresno data66

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length173 mm310 mm
Width1-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount256 MB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed660 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth42.24 GB/s672.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.7
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 3500 0.67
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 82.57
+12224%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 3500 259
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 31811
+12182%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−22800%
229
+22800%
1440p1−2
−15200%
153
+15200%
4K0−195

Cost per frame, $

1080p1599.003.49
1440p1599.005.22
4Kno data8.41

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Hitman 3 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Hitman 3 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 442
+0%
442
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Hitman 3 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 407
+0%
407
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 210
+0%
210
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 144
+0%
144
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Hitman 3 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 306
+0%
306
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 159
+0%
159
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hitman 3 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 162
+0%
162
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 69
+0%
69
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

This is how FX 3500 and RTX 4070 Ti SUPER compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 22800% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 15200% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.67 82.57
Recency 22 May 2006 8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 285 Watt

FX 3500 has 256.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, on the other hand, has a 12223.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 3500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3500 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500
Quadro FX 3500
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FX 3500 Quadro FX 3500
vs
NVS 310 NVS 310
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
vs
RTX 4070 Ti GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
FX 3500 Quadro FX 3500
vs
FX 5500 Quadro FX 5500
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
Arc A380 Arc A380
Quadro 2000 Quadro 2000
vs
R5 M435 Radeon R5 M435
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
vs
GT 740M GeForce GT 740M
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
ATI V3700 FirePro V3700
Plex 1000 Model IV Quadro Plex 1000 Model IV
vs
GeForce MX570 GeForce MX570
FX 1300 Quadro FX 1300
vs
G100 OEM GeForce G100 OEM
Quadro2 Pro Quadro2 Pro
vs
RX 7900 XTX Radeon RX 7900 XTX
GeForce MX150 GeForce MX150
vs
UHD Graphics Xe G1 UHD Graphics Xe G1
Pro 560 Radeon Pro 560
vs
ATI Mobility HD 2600 Mobility Radeon HD 2600
Pro 560 Radeon Pro 560
vs
ATI HD 2600 XT Mac Edition Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 9 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2667 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.