GeForce FX 5200 Ultra vs Quadro FX 3500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 3500 with GeForce FX 5200 Ultra, including specs and performance data.

FX 3500
2006
256 MB GDDR3, 80 Watt
0.67
+2133%

FX 3500 outperforms FX 5200 Ultra by a whopping 2133% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11821487
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.57no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameG71NV34 A2
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 May 2006 (18 years ago)6 March 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 $149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FX 3500 and FX 5200 Ultra have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed450 MHz325 MHz
Number of transistors278 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Wattno data
Texture fill rate9.0001.300
ROPs164
TMUs204

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 8x
Length173 mm171 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed660 MHz325 MHz
Memory bandwidth42.24 GB/s10.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)9.0a
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.11.5 (2.1)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 3500 0.67
+2133%
FX 5200 Ultra 0.03

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 3500 259
+2058%
FX 5200 Ultra 12

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.67 0.03
Recency 22 May 2006 6 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 150 nm

FX 3500 has a 2133.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro FX 3500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5200 Ultra in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3500 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce FX 5200 Ultra is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500
Quadro FX 3500
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra
GeForce FX 5200 Ultra

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 9 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 6 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5200 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.