Tesla M2075 vs Quadro FX 3450

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameNV41GF110
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date28 July 2005 (19 years ago)25 July 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$135.75 $2,399

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data448
Core clock speed425 MHz574 MHz
Number of transistors190 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)83 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate5.10032.14
Floating-point processing powerno data1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs1256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length226 mm248 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz783 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s150.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_0)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)4.6
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 July 2005 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 83 Watt 200 Watt

FX 3450 has 141% lower power consumption.

Tesla M2075, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 225% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3450 and Tesla M2075. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450
Quadro FX 3450
NVIDIA Tesla M2075
Tesla M2075

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 10 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Tesla M2075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.