Radeon 550X vs Quadro FX 3400

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated709
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data5.14
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNV45Lexa
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 June 2004 (20 years ago)27 March 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speed350 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1218 MHz
Number of transistors222 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)101 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate5.60038.98
Floating-point processing powerno data1.247 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs1632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed450 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s112.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_0)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2004 27 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 101 Watt 50 Watt

Radeon 550X has an age advantage of 14 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 102% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3400 and Radeon 550X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3400 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 550X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3400
Quadro FX 3400
AMD Radeon 550X
Radeon 550X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 7 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 13 votes

Rate Radeon 550X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.