UHD Graphics 750 vs Quadro FX 330

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated660
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.86
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameNV37Rocket Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 June 2004 (20 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data256
Core clock speed250 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors45 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate1.00020.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16Ring Bus
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed200 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2004 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 750 has an age advantage of 16 years, a 971.4% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 330 and UHD Graphics 750. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 330 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 330
Quadro FX 330
Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 389 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.