RTX 4500 Ada Generation vs Quadro FX 330

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated10
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data25.48
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNV37AD103
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date28 June 2004 (20 years ago)9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data7680
Core clock speed250 MHz2070 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2580 MHz
Number of transistors45 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt210 Watt
Texture fill rate1.000619.2
Floating-point processing powerno data39.63 TFLOPS
ROPs280
TMUs4240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mm245 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s432.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2004 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 210 Watt

FX 330 has 900% lower power consumption.

RTX 4500 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 19 years, a 38300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 330 and RTX 4500 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 330
Quadro FX 330
NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation
RTX 4500 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 18 votes

Rate RTX 4500 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.