ATI Rage 128 Ultra vs Quadro FX 2800M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1082not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.00no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 4 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameG92Rage 4
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 December 2009 (14 years ago)1 August 1999 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed600 MHz119 MHz
Number of transistors754 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate28.800.24
Floating-point processing power0.288 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs482

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz119 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s952.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)6.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.2
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2009 1 August 1999
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 250 nm

FX 2800M has an age advantage of 10 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 284.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 2800M and Rage 128 Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 2800M is a mobile workstation card while Rage 128 Ultra is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
Quadro FX 2800M
ATI Rage 128 Ultra
Rage 128 Ultra

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 6 votes

Rate Quadro FX 2800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Rage 128 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.