Radeon RX 5300 OEM vs Quadro FX 2800M
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1079 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 1.00 | no data |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) |
| GPU code name | G92 | Navi 14 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 December 2009 (14 years ago) | 28 May 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1375 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1645 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 754 million | 6,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 135 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 28.80 | 78.96 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.288 TFLOPS | 2.527 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 48 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 96 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 84 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 December 2009 | 28 May 2020 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 3 GB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 135 Watt |
FX 2800M has 80% lower power consumption.
RX 5300 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 2800M and Radeon RX 5300 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro FX 2800M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 5300 OEM is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
