GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs Quadro FX 2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 2000 with GeForce FX 5950 Ultra, including specs and performance data.

FX 2000
2003
128 MB DDR2
0.05

FX 5950 Ultra outperforms FX 2000 by a whopping 200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14781417
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.14
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameNV30NV38
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date21 January 2003 (21 year ago)23 October 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed400 MHz475 MHz
Number of transistors125 million135 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data74 Watt
Texture fill rate3.2003.800
ROPs44
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xAGP 8x
Lengthno data229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x Molex1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR
Maximum RAM amount128 MB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz475 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s30.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a9.0a
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)2.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 2000 0.05
FX 5950 Ultra 0.15
+200%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 2000 18
FX 5950 Ultra 59
+228%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.05 0.15
Recency 21 January 2003 23 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 256 MB

FX 5950 Ultra has a 200% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 2000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 2000
Quadro FX 2000
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate Quadro FX 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 76 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5950 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.