RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Quadro FX 1700M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated33
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data27.65
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG96no data
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2008 (16 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores327424
Core clock speed625 MHzno data
Number of transistors314 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt150 Watt (60 - 150 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate10.00no data
Floating-point processing power0.0992 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-IIno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 1700M 172
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 23017
+13282%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2008 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 150 Watt

FX 1700M has 200% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1700M and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1700M is a mobile workstation card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
Quadro FX 1700M
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 1700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.