Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile vs Quadro FX 1500M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1242not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.67no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameG71Baffin
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date18 April 2006 (18 years ago)1 March 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores271024
Core clock speed375 MHz1002 MHz
Boost clock speed375 MHz1053 MHz
Number of transistors278 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate9.00067.39
Floating-point processing powerno data2.157 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs2464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_0)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2006 1 March 2017
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 50 Watt

FX 1500M has 11.1% lower power consumption.

Pro WX 4170 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1500M and Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
Quadro FX 1500M
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile
Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Quadro FX 1500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 5 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.