ATI FireMV 2200 PCI vs Quadro FX 1500M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1242not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.67no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameG71RV280
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date18 April 2006 (18 years ago)2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores27no data
Core clock speed375 MHz240 MHz
Boost clock speed375 MHzno data
Number of transistors278 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate9.0000.96
ROPs164
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCI
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz400 MBps
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s3.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DMS-59

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)8.1
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.11.4
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

FX 1500M has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireMV 2200 PCI, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1500M and FireMV 2200 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1500M is a mobile workstation card while FireMV 2200 PCI is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
Quadro FX 1500M
ATI FireMV 2200 PCI
FireMV 2200 PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Quadro FX 1500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2200 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.