Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU vs Quadro FX 1500M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1240not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.68no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)no data
GPU code nameG71no data
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date18 April 2006 (18 years ago)31 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2730
Core clock speed375 MHzno data
Boost clock speed375 MHzno data
Number of transistors278 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt53 Watt
Texture fill rate9.000no data
ROPs16no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfaceMXM-IIno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3LPDDR5-6400
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)no data
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2006 31 October 2023
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 53 Watt

FX 1500M has 17.8% lower power consumption.

Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1500M and Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1500M is a mobile workstation card while Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
Quadro FX 1500M
Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU
M3 Max 30-Core GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Quadro FX 1500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 74 votes

Rate Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.