A100 SXM4 80 GB vs Quadro FX 1500M
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | G7x (2005−2007) | Ampere (2020−2024) |
| GPU code name | G71GLM | GA100 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 18 April 2006 (18 years ago) | 16 November 2020 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 27 | 6912 |
| Core clock speed | 7 MHz | 1410 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 375 MHz | 1410 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 278 million | 54,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 400 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 9.000 | 609.1 |
| Floating-point performance | no data | 19.49 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Width | no data | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | HBM2e |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 80 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 5120 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 3.2 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | 2,039 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | N/A |
| Shader Model | 3.0 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | N/A |
| OpenCL | N/A | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | - | 8.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 18 April 2006 | 16 November 2020 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 80 GB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 400 Watt |
FX 1500M has 1900% lower power consumption.
A100 SXM4 80 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 15900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1500M and A100 SXM4 80 GB. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro FX 1500M is a mobile workstation card while A100 SXM4 80 GB is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
