Playstation 4 Pro GPU vs Quadro FX 1500

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameG71Neo
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date20 April 2006 (18 years ago)10 November 2016 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 $399

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2304
Core clock speed325 MHz911 MHz
Number of transistors278 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate7.800131.2
Floating-point processing powerno data4.198 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs24144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Length173 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed625 MHz1700 MHz
Memory bandwidth40 GB/s217.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)N/A
Shader Model3.06.0
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 April 2006 10 November 2016
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 150 Watt

FX 1500 has 130.8% lower power consumption.

Playstation 4 Pro GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 462.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1500 and Playstation 4 Pro GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1500 is a workstation card while Playstation 4 Pro GPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500
Quadro FX 1500
AMD Playstation 4 Pro GPU
Playstation 4 Pro GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 32 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 415 votes

Rate Playstation 4 Pro GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.