GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI vs Quadro FX 1400

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)G7x (2005−2006)
GPU code nameNV41G71M
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date9 August 2004 (20 years ago)12 October 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data64
Core clock speed350 MHz16 MHz
Boost clock speedno data575 MHz
Number of transistors222 million556 Million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate4.200no data
ROPs8no data
TMUs12no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB2x512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Videono data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)GDDR3
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 August 2004 12 October 2006
Chip lithography 130 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 90 Watt

FX 1400 has 63.6% lower power consumption.

Go 7950 GTX SLI, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1400 and GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1400 is a workstation card while GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1400
Quadro FX 1400
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI
GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 33 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 2 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.