Quadro NVS 280 PCIe vs Quadro FX 1300

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1462not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.11no data
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameNV38NV37
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date9 August 2004 (20 years ago)25 May 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed350 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors135 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate2.8001.100
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length241 mm168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount128 MB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed275 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth17.6 GB/s8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DMS-59

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a9.0a
OpenGL2.11.5 (2.1)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 August 2004 25 May 2004
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 13 Watt

FX 1300 has an age advantage of 2 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 15.4% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 280 PCIe, on the other hand, has 323.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1300 and Quadro NVS 280 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1300
Quadro FX 1300
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCIe
Quadro NVS 280 PCIe

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro NVS 280 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.