GeForce 720M vs Quadro FX 1300

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1461not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.11no data
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameNV38GF117
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date9 August 2004 (20 years ago)1 April 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data96
Core clock speed350 MHz625 MHz
Number of transistors135 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt33 Watt
Texture fill rate2.80010.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.24 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed275 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth17.6 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 August 2004 1 April 2013
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 33 Watt

GeForce 720M has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1300 and GeForce 720M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1300 is a workstation card while GeForce 720M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1300
Quadro FX 1300
NVIDIA GeForce 720M
GeForce 720M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 91 vote

Rate GeForce 720M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.