GRID K220Q vs Quadro FX 1300

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated842
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.14
Power efficiencyno data0.73
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameNV38GK104
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date9 August 2004 (20 years ago)2 July 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 $469

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1536
Core clock speed350 MHz745 MHz
Number of transistors135 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate2.80095.36
Floating-point processing powerno data2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs8128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed275 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth17.6 GB/s160.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 1300 34
GRID K220Q 912
+2582%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 August 2004 2 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 225 Watt

FX 1300 has 309.1% lower power consumption.

GRID K220Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1300 and GRID K220Q. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1300
Quadro FX 1300
NVIDIA GRID K220Q
GRID K220Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3 votes

Rate GRID K220Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.