Quadro K2200 vs Quadro 7000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 7000 and Quadro K2200, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro 7000
2012
6 GB GDDR5, 204 Watt
9.10

K2200 outperforms 7000 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking480476
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.21
Power efficiency3.069.32
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameGF110GM107
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date2 May 2012 (12 years ago)22 July 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$14,499 $395.75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro 7000 and Quadro K2200 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512640
Core clock speed651 MHz1046 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1124 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)204 Watt68 Watt
Texture fill rate41.6644.96
Floating-point processing power1.332 TFLOPS1.439 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs6440

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length248 mm202 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed851 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth163.4 GB/s80.19 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A+
CUDA2.05.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 7000 9.10
Quadro K2200 9.24
+1.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 7000 3505
Quadro K2200 3559
+1.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.10 9.24
Recency 2 May 2012 22 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 204 Watt 68 Watt

Quadro 7000 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Quadro K2200, on the other hand, has a 1.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro 7000 and Quadro K2200.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 7000
Quadro 7000
NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Quadro K2200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 5 votes

Rate Quadro 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 420 votes

Rate Quadro K2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.