Radeon HD 6755G2 vs Quadro 600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro 400 Quadro 410 Quadro 600
VS
Radeon HD 6310 Radeon HD 6470M Radeon HD 6720G2 Radeon HD 6730M Radeon HD 6740G2 Radeon HD 6750M Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition Radeon HD 6755G2 Radeon HD 6760G2 Radeon HD 6770M Radeon HD 6770M Mac Edition Radeon HD 6775G2

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 600 with Radeon HD 6755G2, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 600
2010
1 GB DDR3, 40 Watt
1.38

HD 6755G2 outperforms 600 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro 600 Quadro 600
HD 6755G2 HD 6755G2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1013989
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.15no data
Power efficiency2.41no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGF108no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 December 2010 (13 years ago)14 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96880
Core clock speed640 MHzno data
Number of transistors585 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Wattno data
Texture fill rate10.24no data
Floating-point processing power0.2458 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed800 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA2.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p18−20
−11.1%
20
+11.1%
Full HD12−14
−16.7%
14
+16.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p14.92no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how Quadro 600 and HD 6755G2 compete in popular games:

  • HD 6755G2 is 11% faster in 900p
  • HD 6755G2 is 17% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 49 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.38 1.46
Recency 13 December 2010 14 June 2011

HD 6755G2 has a 5.8% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 6 months.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro 600 and Radeon HD 6755G2.

Be aware that Quadro 600 is a workstation card while Radeon HD 6755G2 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro 600
Quadro 600
AMD Radeon HD 6755G2
Radeon HD 6755G2
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
GRID K180Q GRID K180Q
HD 6755G2 Radeon HD 6755G2
vs
HD 6570M Radeon HD 6570M
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
FX 5600 Quadro FX 5600
ATI FireGL V7300 FireGL V7300
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
ATI FireGL V5000 FireGL V5000
vs
GeForce MX250 GeForce MX250
ATI FireGL X3-256 FireGL X3 256
vs
535 Mobile Radeon 535 Mobile
ATI FireGL X3-256 FireGL X3 256
vs
Graphics Radeon Graphics
ATI FireGL X3-256 FireGL X3 256
vs
T550 Mobile T550 Mobile
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
GeForce4 MX 440 GeForce4 MX 440
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
W6150M FirePro W6150M
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
vs
GRID K520 GRID K520
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
vs
6200 TurboCache GeForce 6200 TurboCache
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
vs
Go 6600 NPB 128M GeForce Go 6600 NPB 128M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 409 votes

Rate Quadro 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 23 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6755G2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.