Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs Quadro 500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking982not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.95no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGF108Ponte Vecchio
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date22 February 2011 (13 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9616384
Core clock speed700 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1600 MHz
Number of transistors585 million100,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt2400 Watt
Texture fill rate11.201,638
Floating-point processing power0.2688 TFLOPS52.43 TFLOPS
ROPs4no data
TMUs161024
Tensor Coresno data1024
Ray Tracing Coresno data128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1565 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s3,205 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 February 2011 10 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 2400 Watt

Quadro 500M has 6757.1% lower power consumption.

Data Center GPU Max Subsystem, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 500M and Data Center GPU Max Subsystem. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 500M is a mobile workstation card while Data Center GPU Max Subsystem is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 500M
Quadro 500M
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro 500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 116 votes

Rate Data Center GPU Max Subsystem on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.