Quadro NVS 510M vs Quadro 5000 SDI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated1204
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGF100G71
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date23 February 2011 (13 years ago)21 August 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,899 no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores352no data
Core clock speed513 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million278 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)172 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate22.5710.80
Floating-point performance0.7223 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length248 mmno data
WidthQuad-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2.5 GB256 MB
Memory bus width320 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed3000 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth120.0 GB/s19.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video, 2x SDINo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 February 2011 21 August 2006
Maximum RAM amount 2.5 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 172 Watt 35 Watt

5000 SDI has an age advantage of 4 years, a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 510M, on the other hand, has 391.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 5000 SDI and Quadro NVS 510M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 5000 SDI is a workstation card while Quadro NVS 510M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 5000 SDI
Quadro 5000 SDI
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M
Quadro NVS 510M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Quadro 5000 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 510M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.