UHD Graphics 600 vs Quadro 410

Place in the ranking	1085	1141
Place by popularity	not in top-100	52
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.14	no data
Power efficiency	2.06	11.93
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	GK107	Gemini Lake GT1
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	7 August 2012 (12 years ago)	11 December 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$149	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	96
Core clock speed	706 MHz	200 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	650 MHz
Number of transistors	1,270 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	38 Watt	5 Watt
Texture fill rate	11.30	7.800
Floating-point processing power	0.2711 TFLOPS	0.1248 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	2
TMUs	16	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	Ring Bus
Length	176 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	System Shared
Memory bus width	64 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	891 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	14.26 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort

Portable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	+
CUDA	3.0	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro 410 1.14
+31%

UHD Graphics 600 0.87

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 410 439
+31.4%

UHD Graphics 600 334

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	12−14 +20%	10 −20%
1440p	1−2 +0%	1 +0%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	12.42	no data
1440p	149.00	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Valorant	13 +0%	13 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	7 +0%	7 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Valorant	11 +0%	11 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	7 +0%	7 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Valorant	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart	0−1	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

This is how Quadro 410 and UHD Graphics 600 compete in popular games:

Quadro 410 is 20% faster in 1080p
A tie in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 36 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.14	0.87
Recency	7 August 2012	11 December 2017
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	38 Watt	5 Watt

Quadro 410 has a 31% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 660% lower power consumption.

The Quadro 410 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 410 is a workstation card while UHD Graphics 600 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Quadro 410

UHD Graphics 600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R9 M380 Mac Edition

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.6 14 votes

Rate Quadro 410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

3 3686 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 410 or UHD Graphics 600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.