Radeon RX 7600M XT vs Quadro 410

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID K1 GRID K100 GRID K120Q GRID K140Q GRID K180Q GRID K340 NVS 510 Quadro 410 Quadro K420 Quadro K600 Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000D
VS
Radeon RX 6500M Radeon RX 6550M Radeon RX 6600M Radeon RX 6650M Radeon RX 6700S Radeon RX 6800M Radeon RX 6850M XT Radeon RX 7600M Radeon RX 7600M XT Radeon RX 7600S Radeon RX 7700S Radeon RX 7900M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 410 with Radeon RX 7600M XT, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 410
2012
512 MB DDR3, 38 Watt
1.13

RX 7600M XT outperforms 410 by a whopping 2924% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro 410 Quadro 410
RX 7600M XT RX 7600M XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1068151
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.06no data
Power efficiency2.0619.72
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGK107Navi 33
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date7 August 2012 (12 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922048
Core clock speed706 MHz1280 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2469 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)38 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate11.30316.0
Floating-point processing power0.2711 TFLOPS20.23 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs16128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length176 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.26 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 410 1.13
RX 7600M XT 34.17
+2924%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 410 437
RX 7600M XT 13184
+2917%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−3900%
120
+3900%
1440p2−3
−3100%
64
+3100%
4K1−2
−3400%
35
+3400%

Cost per frame, $

1080p49.67no data
1440p74.50no data
4K149.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 131
+0%
131
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 139
+0%
139
+0%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Hitman 3 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 237
+0%
237
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 114
+0%
114
+0%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Hitman 3 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 142
+0%
142
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 208
+0%
208
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85
+0%
85
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 92
+0%
92
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180
+0%
180
+0%
Hitman 3 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140
+0%
140
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 180
+0%
180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
+0%
100
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60
+0%
60
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 62
+0%
62
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 67
+0%
67
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Hitman 3 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 106
+0%
106
+0%
Metro Exodus 92
+0%
92
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120
+0%
120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+0%
74
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hitman 3 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Metro Exodus 99
+0%
99
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
+0%
52
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 32
+0%
32
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30
+0%
30
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90
+0%
90
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 64
+0%
64
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 22
+0%
22
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

This is how Quadro 410 and RX 7600M XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600M XT is 3900% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600M XT is 3100% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7600M XT is 3400% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.13 34.17
Recency 7 August 2012 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 38 Watt 120 Watt

Quadro 410 has 215.8% lower power consumption.

RX 7600M XT, on the other hand, has a 2923.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7600M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 410 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 410 is a workstation card while Radeon RX 7600M XT is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro 410
Quadro 410
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 7600M XT
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro 410 Quadro 410
vs
FX 4600 Quadro FX 4600
RX 7600M XT Radeon RX 7600M XT
vs
RX 6800M Radeon RX 6800M
Quadro 410 Quadro 410
vs
FX 1800 Quadro FX 1800
Quadro 410 Quadro 410
vs
RTX 4070 Mobile GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
Quadro 410 Quadro 410
vs
GeForce MX550 GeForce MX550
Quadro 410 Quadro 410
vs
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
Quadro 410 Quadro 410
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
Quadro 410 Quadro 410
vs
GeForce MX330 GeForce MX330
Quadro 410 Quadro 410
vs
RX 7600M Radeon RX 7600M
Quadro 410 Quadro 410
vs
UHD Graphics 770 Mobile UHD Graphics 770 Mobile
K5000 Mac Edition Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
vs
ATI M9+ M9+
K5000 Mac Edition Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
vs
RTX 4060 GeForce RTX 4060
K5000 Mac Edition Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
vs
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.5 13 votes

Rate Quadro 410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 67 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.