Quadro Plex 7000 vs Quadro 4000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking732not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.34no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameFermiGF110
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date22 February 2011 (13 years ago)25 July 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 $14,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores336512
Core clock speed475 MHz574 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate26.6036.74
Floating-point performance0.6384 gflops1.176 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data522 mm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s144.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DVI, 2x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.12.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 February 2011 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 600 Watt

Quadro 4000M has 500% lower power consumption.

Plex 7000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 4000M and Quadro Plex 7000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 4000M is a mobile workstation card while Quadro Plex 7000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
Quadro 4000M
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 7000
Quadro Plex 7000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 33 votes

Rate Quadro 4000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3 votes

Rate Quadro Plex 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.