GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs Quadro 400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-10091
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGT216TU117
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date5 April 2011 (13 years ago)1 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 $149

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48896
Core clock speed450 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1590 MHz
Number of transistors486 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate7.20089.04
Floating-point performance108 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length163 mm229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1540 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.32 GB/s192.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA1.27.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 April 2011 1 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 75 Watt

Quadro 400 has 134.4% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650 GDDR6, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 400 and GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 400 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 400
Quadro 400
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 13 votes

Rate Quadro 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1703 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.