FirePro S9300 X2 vs Quadro 400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1261not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.83no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGT216Capsaicin
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date5 April 2011 (13 years ago)31 March 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 $5,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores484096
Core clock speed450 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors486 million8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate7.200217.6
Floating-point processing power0.108 TFLOPS6.963 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs16256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length163 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed770 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.32 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.16.0
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 April 2011 31 March 2016
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 300 Watt

Quadro 400 has 837.5% lower power consumption.

S9300 X2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 400 and FirePro S9300 X2. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 400
Quadro 400
AMD FirePro S9300 X2
FirePro S9300 X2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 13 votes

Rate Quadro 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 6 votes

Rate FirePro S9300 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.