Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB vs Quadro 3000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking816not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.20no data
Power efficiency2.38no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGF104GA10B
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date22 February 2011 (13 years ago)March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$398.96 $1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2402048
Core clock speed450 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate18.0083.20
Floating-point processing power0.432 TFLOPS5.325 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs4064
Tensor Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x4

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB64 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed625 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s204.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.18.6

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 64 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 60 Watt

Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 400% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 3000M and Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 3000M is a mobile workstation card while Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
Quadro 3000M
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB
Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 44 votes

Rate Quadro 3000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 11 votes

Rate Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.