Radeon Vega 7 Mobile vs Quadro 2000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking879not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.28no data
Power efficiency2.54no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF106Cezanne
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date13 January 2011 (13 years ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$46.56 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192448
Core clock speed550 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate17.6053.20
Floating-point processing power0.4224 TFLOPS1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs3228

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 January 2011 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 45 Watt

Vega 7 Mobile has an age advantage of 10 years, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 22.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 2000M and Radeon Vega 7 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 2000M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon Vega 7 Mobile is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
Quadro 2000M
AMD Radeon Vega 7 Mobile
Radeon Vega 7 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 92 votes

Rate Quadro 2000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 57 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.