GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs Quadro 2000M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 2000M with GeForce GTX 460 OEM, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 2000M
2011
2 GB DDR3, 55 Watt
2.02

GTX 460 OEM outperforms 2000M by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking888780
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.28no data
Power efficiency2.521.36
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGF106GF104
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date13 January 2011 (13 years ago)11 October 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$46.56 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192336
Core clock speed550 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate17.6036.40
Floating-point processing power0.4224 TFLOPS0.8736 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs3256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz850 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s108.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.12.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD37
−35.1%
50−55
+35.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p1.26no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Hitman 3 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Hitman 3 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Hitman 3 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

This is how Quadro 2000M and GTX 460 OEM compete in popular games:

  • GTX 460 OEM is 35% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.02 2.98
Recency 13 January 2011 11 October 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 150 Watt

Quadro 2000M has an age advantage of 3 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 172.7% lower power consumption.

GTX 460 OEM, on the other hand, has a 47.5% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GTX 460 OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 2000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 2000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 460 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
Quadro 2000M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
GeForce GTX 460 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 94 votes

Rate Quadro 2000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 16 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.