GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs Quadro 3000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro 1000M Quadro 2000M Quadro 3000M Quadro 3000M X2 Quadro 4000M Quadro 5000M Quadro 5010M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 460 OEM GTX 460 SE GTX 460 SE v2 GTX 460 v2 GTX 460 v2 ES GTX 460 X2

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 3000M with GeForce GTX 460 OEM, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 3000M
2011
2 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
2.23

GTX 460 OEM outperforms 3000M by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro 3000M Quadro 3000M
GTX 460 OEM GTX 460 OEM

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking838795
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.25no data
Power efficiency2.361.36
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGF104GF104
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date22 February 2011 (14 years ago)11 October 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$398.96 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240336
Core clock speed450 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate18.0036.40
Floating-point processing power0.432 TFLOPS0.8736 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs4056

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed625 MHz850 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s108.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.12.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD51
−7.8%
55−60
+7.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p7.82no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 40−45
−7.1%
45−50
+7.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
−6.4%
50−55
+6.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
−8%
27−30
+8%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Valorant 40−45
−7.1%
45−50
+7.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
−8%
27−30
+8%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Valorant 40−45
−7.1%
45−50
+7.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Valorant 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how Quadro 3000M and GTX 460 OEM compete in popular games:

  • GTX 460 OEM is 8% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.23 2.58
Recency 22 February 2011 11 October 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 150 Watt

Quadro 3000M has an age advantage of 4 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 100% lower power consumption.

GTX 460 OEM, on the other hand, has a 15.7% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GTX 460 OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 3000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 3000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 460 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
Quadro 3000M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
GeForce GTX 460 OEM
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro 3000M Quadro 3000M
vs
FirePro M4150 FirePro M4150
GTX 460 OEM GeForce GTX 460 OEM
vs
ATI HD 5750 Radeon HD 5750
Quadro 3000M Quadro 3000M
vs
K2000M Quadro K2000M
HD 8750M AMD HD 8750M
vs
ATI 9600 9600
HD 8750M AMD HD 8750M
vs
GT 340 OEM 340 OEM
HD 8750M AMD HD 8750M
vs
UHD Graphics 610 Graphics 610
Quadro 3000M Quadro 3000M
vs
GT 710 710
Quadro 3000M Quadro 3000M
vs
Tesla M6 M6
Quadro 3000M Quadro 3000M
vs
9800 GTX+ 9800 GTX+
Quadro 3000M Quadro 3000M
vs
Quadro 600 600
Quadro 3000M Quadro 3000M
vs
GTX 750 Ti OEM 750 Ti OEM
Quadro 3000M Quadro 3000M
vs
R8 M350DX M350DX
Quadro 3000M Quadro 3000M
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 940 Graphics 940

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 50 votes

Rate Quadro 3000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 17 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 3000M or GeForce GTX 460 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.