ROG Ally Extreme GPU vs Playstation 4 Slim GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameLiverpool 16nmPhoenix
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 September 2016 (8 years ago)13 June 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152768
Core clock speed800 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2700 MHz
Number of transistorsno data25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate57.60129.6
Floating-point processing power1.843 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs7248
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPno data
Length288 mm280 mm
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth176.0 GB/s51.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x USB Type-C

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1*12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.11.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 September 2016 13 June 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 30 Watt

ROG Ally Extreme GPU has an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Playstation 4 Slim GPU and ROG Ally Extreme GPU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Playstation 4 Slim GPU
Playstation 4 Slim GPU
AMD ROG Ally Extreme GPU
ROG Ally Extreme GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 141 vote

Rate Playstation 4 Slim GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate ROG Ally Extreme GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.