Sony Playstation 2 GPU 250nm vs Playstation 3 RSX

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)no data
GPU code nameRSX-CXD2991GS-250nm
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date11 November 2006 (18 years ago)4 March 2000 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed550 MHz147 MHz
Number of transistors300 million54 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)81 Watt79 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.176
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPno data
Lengthno data302 mm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataeDRAM
Maximum RAM amountno data4 MB
Memory bus widthno data2560 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz150 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data48 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/AN/A
OpenGLES 1.1N/A
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 November 2006 4 March 2000
Chip lithography 65 nm 250 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 81 Watt 79 Watt

Playstation 3 RSX has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 284.6% more advanced lithography process.

Sony Playstation 2 GPU 250nm, on the other hand, has 2.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Playstation 3 RSX and Sony Playstation 2 GPU 250nm. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Playstation 3 RSX
Playstation 3 RSX
Sony Playstation 2 GPU 250nm
Sony Playstation 2 GPU 250nm

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 80 votes

Rate Playstation 3 RSX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Sony Playstation 2 GPU 250nm on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.